Topic A- The Question of AI, Automation, and Universal Basic Income
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and automation represents one of the most transformative and difficult challenges of modern economic stability. Around the globe there are roughly hundreds of millions of jobs across more than a dozen major industries at risk of becoming useless. When these technologies are implemented without social safety nets they go from being a force of innovation to a dangerous time bomb that could go off from any rapid market disturbances. A single algorithmic breakthrough, robotic deployment, or automated supply chain transition aimed at maximising corporate efficiency can cause the catastrophic loss of working-class livelihoods. This causes widespread financial destruction and makes traditional career paths un-viable for decades; multi-generational poverty crises emerge from the ashes as well as the long term displacement of workers from even sectors surrounding the ones directly automated.
The main documentation governing this issue is Article 23 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, alongside foundational International Labor Organization (ILO) conventions. It establishes the right to work, free choice of employment, and protection against unemployment, ensuring human dignity even in the pursuit of industrial objectives as economic abandonment can cause the significant loss of stability amongst the vulnerable population. The modern reality of technological advancement however has shown many gaps in compliance and enforcement. Transnational corporations and unregulated tech entities exploit these legal gray areas as "innovation shields," positioning automated systems and gig-economy structures to bypass traditional employment benefits and deter labor organizing. This is a direct violation of international economic norms and tests the limits of global social security.
Topic B- On the Issue of Securing Global Fuel Supply and Economic Stability in the Context of the Strait of Hormuz Crisis
The persistent threat of blockades and maritime conflict within the Strait of Hormuz represents one of the most volatile and difficult to traverse challenges of modern global economics. Around the globe there are roughly billions of citizens dependent on the 20 million barrels of oil that transit this narrow geographic chokepoint daily. When regional tensions escalate near these vital shipping lanes they go from being an artery of global trade to a dangerous time bomb that could go off from any diplomatic disturbances. A single naval blockade, targeted missile strike, or localized maritime skirmish aimed at commercial oil tankers can cause the catastrophic disruption of the global fuel supply. This causes widespread economic destructions and makes international markets un-stable for decades; multi-generational inflation crises emerge from the ashes as well as the long term crippling of developing economies from even continents surrounding the initial conflict zone.
The main documentation governing this issue is the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), specifically the provisions outlining the right of transit passage. It prohibits the impedance of international navigation and protects commercial vessels traversing crucial straits, even during geopolitical disputes, as supply chain collapses can cause the significant loss of livelihood amongst the global population. The modern reality of geopolitical brinkmanship however has shown many gaps in compliance and enforcement. State actors and state-sponsored proxy entities exploit these geographic bottlenecks as "economic weapons," positioning asymmetric naval forces, drones, and maritime mines close to shipping lanes to deter foreign intervention. This is a direct violation of international maritime norms and tests the limits of international economic law.